Coordinated Servicing and Refueling of Satellites

We investigate peer-to-peer and mixed refueling strategies for satellite constellations to increase robustness and efficiency in on-orbit servicing operations

It has long been recognized that servicing and refueling spacecraft in orbit has the potential to revolutionize spacecraft operations by extending the useful lifetime of the spacecraft, by reducing launching and insurance cost, and by increasing operational flexibility and robustness. Most of the previous studies in the literature have assumed that a single spacecraft alone undertakes the task of refueling the whole constellation. That is, a single service spacecraft plays the role of the sole supplier of fuel. In this work we investigate peer-to-peer (P2P) refueling scenarios for satellite constellations with (potentially) a large number of satellites. In a P2P scenario, no single spacecraft is in charge of the complete refueling process. Instead, all satellites share the responsibility of refueling each other on an equal footing. A P2P refueling strategy is, by definition, a distributed method for replenishing a constellation of spacecraft with fuel/propellant. Consequently, it offers a great degree of robustness and protection against failures. For instance, with a P2P strategy a failure of a single spacecraft will have almost no impact on the refueling of the rest of the constellation. On the contrary, a failure of the service vehicle in a single-spacecraft scenario will result in the failure of the whole mission.

Single-spacecraft refueling strategy Mixed refueling strategy Single-spacecraft refueling strategy (left) and mixed refueling strategy (right).

A P2P scenario arises naturally as an essential component of a mixed refueling strategy. By mixed refueling strategy we mean a strategy which involves at least two stages. During the first stage a single spacecraft refuels only a certain fraction (perhaps half) of the satellites. During the second stage the satellites that received fuel during the first stage act as go-betweens, and distribute the fuel to the rest of the constellation in a P2P manner. That is, a P2P refueling strategy can be implemented as the final distribution phase of a single-vehicle refueling strategy. One of the interesting results of our analysis shows that a mixed refueling strategy is more fuel-efficient than a single-spacecraft strategy, especially for a large number of satellites in the constellation and for short refueling periods. As a matter of fact, cases exist for which the single-spacecraft scenario is infeasible (due to the time constraint), while a mixed refueling strategy is still possible.

Peer-to-peer refueling pairings on a fourteen-satellite graph, shown at four transfer times

The mathematical tools used to solve the coordinated refueling problem is graph theory and operational theoretic algorithms (matching between  bi-partite graphs, auction algorithms). The auction algorithms, in particular, have the advantage that a matching between fuel deficient and fuel sufficient satellites in the constellation can be found in a distributed or asynchronous manner, which is desirable for a large number of satellites.

A key ingredient in our approach is a new method for solving the multi-revolution Lambert’s problem. The classical Lambert’s problem computes the transfer orbit between to points in space for a given amount of time. Allowing several revolutions makes the problem more complicated and requires the calculation of 2*Nmax+1 possible solutions.

We have found a way to compute the transfer orbit, for given time and initial and final orbits, by checking only two out of the possible 2*Nmax+1 candidate solutions. The final outcome of this process is a quick calculation of the optimal (fuel-efficient) Delta-V as a function of the transfer time and the initial separation angle theta between the two satellites. This can be represented as a contour plot.

Lambert's problem: two transfer orbits of differing eccentricity joining the same two points Delta-v contours against time of flight and initial lead angle, with two completed transfers marked Lambert’s problem (left): two transfer orbits of differing eccentricity joining the same two points. Right: Δv contours against time of flight and initial lead angle, with two completed transfers marked.

Sponsors

This project is sponsored by AFOSR.

Selected Publications and Presentations

1.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Optimal Scheduling for Servicing Multiple Satellites in a Circular Constellation,” AIAA Paper 02-4907, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, Monterey, California, August 5-8, 2002.

2.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Between Two Circular Orbits Using Multiple Revolution Lambert's Solutions,” AIAA Paper 02-4844, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Monterey, California, August 5-8, 2002.

3.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Optimal Two-Impulse Rendezvous Between Two Circular Orbits Using Multiple-Revolution Lambert's Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 50-61, 2003.

4.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Peer-to-Peer Refueling within a Satellite Constellation Part I: Zero-Cost Rendezvous Case,” Proceedings, 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, HI, December 9-12, 2003, pp. 4345-4350.

5.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Extension of Battin's Method for the Multiple-Revolution Lambert's Problem,” AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialists Conference, Big Sky, MO, August 3-7, 2003.

6.

Shen, H. and Tsiotras, P., “Peer-to-Peer Refueling within a Satellite Constellation Part II: Nonzero-Cost Rendezvous Case,” Proceedings, 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, HI, December 9-12, 2003, pp. 4363-4368.

7.

Dutta, A. and Tsiotras, P., “Asynchronous Optimal Mixed P2P Satellite Refueling Strategies,” D. Shuster Astronautics Symposium, Buffalo, NY, June 13-15, 2005, AAS Paper 2005-474.

8.

Tsiotras, P., and de Nailly, A.., “Comparison Between Peer-to-Peer and Single-Spacecraft Refueling Strategies for Spacecraft in Circular Orbits,” Infotech at Aerospace Conference, Crystal City, DC, September 26-29, 2005, AIAA Paper 2005-7115.

9.

Salazar A. and Tsiotras, P., “An Auction Algorithm for Optimal Satellite Refueling,” Georgia Tech Space Systems Engineering Conference, Atlanta, GA, November 8-10, 2005, Paper No. GT-SSEC.F.5,.

PDF
10.

Shen H. and Tsiotras, P., “Peer-to-Peer Refueling for Circular Satellite Constellations,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 1220-1230, 2005.

11.

Salazar A. and Tsiotras, P., “An Auction Algorithm for Allocating Fuel in Satellite Constellations Using Peer-to-Peer Refueling,” American Control Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 14-16, 2006, pp. 4214-4219, (invited).

PDF
12.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “Asynchronous Optimal Mixed P2P Satellite Refueling Strategies,” Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 54, No. 3-4, pp. 543-565, 2006.

13.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “A Greedy Random Adaptive Search Procedure for Optimal Scheduling of P2P Satellite Refueling,” AAS Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Sedona, AZ, Jan. 28-Feb. 1, 2007, AAS Paper 2007-150.

PDF
14.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “A Network Flow Formulation for an Egalitarian P2P Satellite Refueling Strategy,” AAS Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Sedona, AZ, Jan. 28-Feb. 1, 2007, AAS Paper 2007-151.

PDF
15.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “An Egalitarian Peer-to-Peer Satellite Refueling Strategy,” AIAA Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 608-618, 2008.

16.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras. P., “Hohmann-Phasing Cooperative Rendezvous Maneuvers,” F. Landis Markley Astronautics Symposium, Chesapeake Bay, June 28-July 2, 2008, Paper AAS 08-297.

PDF
17.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “A Cooperative P2P Refueling Strategy for Circular Satellite Constellations,” AIAA Space Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, Sept. 9-11, 2008, AIAA Paper 2008-7643.

PDF
18.

Dutta, A. and Tsiotras, P., “A Cooperative Egalitarian Peer-to-Peer Strategy for Refueling Satellites in Circular Constellations,” AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Savannah, GA, Feb. 8-12, 2009, AAS Paper 2009-109.

PDF
19.

Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “Hohmann-Hohmann and Hohmann-Phasing Cooperative Rendezvous Maneuvers,” Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 57, Nos. 1-2, pp. 393-417, January–June 2009.

20.

Dutta, A. and Tsiotras, P., “A Network Flow Formulation for Cooperative Peer-to-Peer Refueling Strategies,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 1539- 1549, 2010.

21.

Coene, S., Dutta, A., Spiekma, F. and Tsiotras, P., “On the Computational Complexity of Peer-to-Peer Satellite Refueling Strategies,” Information Systems and Operational Research, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 88-94, May 2012.